U.S. President Donald Trump is pushing new measures that could shield him from future investigations after leaving office. His strategy relies on legal decisions, institutional changes, and the use of Executive tools.
The most recent move is the creation of a fund against so-called political “weaponization.” This mechanism aims to protect allies facing processes considered unfair, according to the White House.
However, legal experts warn that the scope of the agreement could go further. They point out that its broad terms could hinder future investigations against Trump, his family, and his businesses.
What Does Trump’s New Fund Entail?
The fund, valued at approximately $1.8 billion, stems from an agreement between Trump and his own administration. It is linked to a lawsuit the president filed against the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).
The agreement includes key benefits for the president. Among them is a type of tax amnesty that limits audits of his past activities.
Additionally, the language of the document is broad. It covers not only tax matters but could also apply to other civil investigations related to his previous conduct.
Why Does It Raise Concerns Among Experts and Opponents?
Constitutional law experts warn that the agreement introduces significant obstacles. These could affect investigations by Congress or future administrations.
One of the most questioned points is the definition of “weaponization.” The term has no precise legal meaning and is interpreted broadly within the agreement.
This could discourage witnesses or collaborators from participating in investigations. It could also benefit people close to Trump who face charges for actions linked to his political circle.
How Does This Strategy Relate to Presidential Power?
Trump’s approach is part of a broader trend. His administration has sought to expand the reach of Executive power and reduce institutional checks.
HRW acusa: Trump deporta a 4,353 cubanos en México
HRW denuncia que Trump deporta a 4,353 cubanos a México donde están «abandonados» sin papeles,...
EN PORTADA: ELECCIONES EN TIEMPOS DE GUERRA
Trump desafió las críticas por su estrategia en la guerra con Irán: “No me importan...
Experts point out that this process has been facilitated by recent Supreme Court decisions. In particular, rulings that reinforce the president’s authority over federal agencies.
The result is a concentration of power in the presidential figure. This breaks with the post-Watergate model, which sought to limit Executive abuses.
What Changes Has Trump Pushed in Control Mechanisms?
Since returning to the White House in 2025, Trump has taken steps to weaken oversight bodies. Among them, the removal of inspectors general from several agencies.
These officials were responsible for investigating possible irregularities within the Government. Their departure reduced the capacity for internal oversight of the Executive.
Transparency laws have also been questioned. The Department of Justice has maintained that the president is not obligated to fully comply with regulations such as the Presidential Records Act.
