Political tension between Washington and Havana has reached a critical breaking point during May 2026. A group of more than 30 Democratic legislators sent an urgent letter to the Donald Trump administration. In the missive, they demand the immediate cessation of any military action plan against the Caribbean island. Additionally, they strongly reject the use of the Guantanamo naval base as a detention center for Cuban migrants.
The letter was sent this Tuesday to key figures in the presidential cabinet. Among the recipients are Pete Hegseth, Secretary of Defense; Marco Rubio, Secretary of State; and Markwayne Mullin, Secretary of National Security. The initiative is led by Illinois legislator Delia Ramírez. The signatories believe that an intervention would be illegal and deeply destabilizing for the entire Western Hemisphere region.
Donald Trump has suggested the possibility of military intervention in Cuba for several weeks. On May 2, the president stated at a rally that he would take control of the island almost immediately. According to his statements, this move would occur once the current conflict in Iran concludes. These remarks have generated a wave of concern among foreign policy experts and human rights advocates.
What Are the Consequences of a Possible Invasion of Cuba?
The Democratic legislators warned that such action would be catastrophic for the Cuban civilian population. In their letter, they point out that the use of force would increase massive displacement of people toward borders. They also assert that it would worsen the suffering of families and harm United States security interests. “It must be rejected unequivocally,” Congress members emphasized in the official document.
For its part, the Cuban Government has responded harshly to statements from the White House. Cuban Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez warned Wednesday that military aggression would trigger an unprecedented humanitarian catastrophe. Rodríguez described the possibility of intervention as a potential “bloodbath” for both countries. These statements came after remarks by the Secretary of Defense, who called the island a national threat.
The rhetoric of confrontation has escalated rapidly since Trump’s return to power last year. The current government maintains that the island’s proximity and its external alliances represent a real danger. However, Democrats argue that pressure policies have historically contributed to civilian displacement and death. For the legislators, the solution does not lie in weapons, but in a revision of diplomatic strategy.
Why Does the Use of Guantanamo Generate So Much Rejection?
A central point of the missive is the rejection of using Guantanamo naval base for migrant purposes. The congressmen described the military’s plans to send Cuban migrants there as “alarming and unacceptable.” This idea was initially suggested by a high-ranking official from Southern Command during a legislative hearing in March. There is concern that Guantanamo would become a legal limbo for those fleeing the island.
Trump promised to convert this base, famous for its detention center for terrorism suspects, into a massive migrant facility. The plan contemplates housing up to 30,000 detained migrants in the United States. Democrats argue that this is not a real response to the regional migration crisis. According to their view, it is an attempt to contain the consequences of Washington’s own economic policies toward Cuba.
The use of military facilities for civilians has been criticized by international organizations in the past. Legislators emphasize that detaining people at Guantanamo circumvents legal protections of U.S. soil. They fear a repeat of abuses documented at the detention center after the September 11, 2001 attacks. The base is now seen as a key piece in the administration’s “zero tolerance” strategy.
| Political Actor | Stated Position | Justification / Argument |
| Admi |
